Movers and Shakers

Eons ago, a friend was the Development Director at a large performing arts organization.  Most their major gift fundraising happened around very social events:  dinners before performances, drinks at intermission, private parties at the donors’ homes where the talent performed.  There was one, big problem with this type of fundraising, and it wasn’t the amount of time staff had to spend planning.

Too often, one or another of her development team would forget that they were staff and no matter how friendly the prospects and donors appeared to be, they simply were not peers.  When they forgot that, they typically ceased to be effective.

Or, as one of my first fundraising mentors elegantly informed me:  “Being a development professional is a lot like being a piece of furniture.”  To the degree furniture is the center of attraction it is because it is needed for something—a place to sit, a table at which to eat—or it is being admired not really for its intrinsic value but rather for the good taste of the person who chose the item.  Likewise with fundraisers.

Or, as another colleague likes to say, “this is no job for an egomaniac.”

In my practice, I meet a lot of fundraisers who don’t seem to understand that their job is to coordinate and facilitate the fundraising process—and the glory goes to the CEO, the Board, the program person.  And even if the development professional is the one who is at the meetings, does the cultivation, makes the ask and then makes nice to the donor, it’s good form and smart politics to thank others for the work you did so well.

Of course, most of the time you would work even better if you included those peers in the process.  Yes, sometimes all it feels like is another layer—but over the years I’ve found that involving my volunteers, even at a distance, not only helps with new prospects but also ties those volunteers more closely to my organization.

A true story:  I was trying to engage a well-connected woman in our community with one of the programs at my college.  I asked the members of our Foundation Board if anyone could help.  Several said they knew her, but the only help that appeared forthcoming was an offer of a telephone number—one that was easily found in the local white pages.

I forged ahead and to make a long story short, the woman indeed became a strong supporter of the program.  I profusely thanked my Board members for their help and tried not to sound too sarcastic.

Years later I was consulting for an organization where this woman was on the Board.  At my first Board meeting, I went over to say hello.  After a few moments of catching up she told me that every time she saw—and here she mentioned the person who had offered me the phone number—she thanked him profusely for involving her with the program.  Go figure.

The point of course is not that the Board member did virtually nothing, but that “my” donor recalled a peer as the impetus for her involvement rather than me or even the program director.

Major gifts, particularly, are best as a team effort.  The professional is the glue that holds the team together, ensures that all the steps are taken and that follow up happens.  He or she documents the process every step of the way.  But make no mistake; the captain of the team is the person to whom the prospect cannot say no.

Fundraising staff may be the “mover” but the “shaker” of this enterprise is almost always a peer, and if not a social peer then it is a business one—the CEO,  the program head, the person who makes the project a reality.

 

Janet Levine works with nonprofits helping them to move their fundraising efforts forward.  Learn more at http://janetlevineconsulting.com

Posted in fundraising, major gifts, volunteers | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Ours IS to Reason Why

When I was a kid, I hated it when my parents or teachers asked me “why” questions:  Why did (or didn’t) you do that?  Why did that happen? Why were you (fill in the blank)?  I wasn’t too crazy about “what” questions, either:  What were you thinking? being  the main one.

As I got older, I didn’t much like my bosses (and certainly not my first husband) asking similar questions.  Every time someone started a sentence with “why” or “what” I just knew that I was in trouble.

Flash forward.  I was now a boss AND a parent.  And I had learned the value of those questions.

If you can take the pejorative out of those words, it becomes easy to understand their importance.  In fact, if before we do almost anything we ask ourselves two questions—and endeavor to answer them—we will find ourselves far more effective in our work.  The two questions?

  1. Why am I doing this?
  2. What do I hope to accomplish?

This really struck home when a Board Chair asked me about evaluating the organization’s ED.  “She’s always really busy,” the Chair told me, “but I’m not quite sure if she is getting anything necessary done.”

It’s the motion theory of management.  If I am moving fast enough, I must be doing the right things.

Not necessarily.

Try this.  For the next few days, before you do pretty much anything (even, perhaps especially, things you do almost by rote), take a big breath and ask yourself the two questions.  Then really consider the answers you come up with.

If you are not clear why you are doing something—or you are doing it because (a) you’ve always done it or someone above you told you to do it—and you cannot quantify what your hope to accomplish, perhaps you are simply spinning your wheels.

Before you abandon what you are doing, however, make sure you have looked at all sides.  Just because you’ve always done this and haven’t always known why, doesn’t mean there isn’t a great reason to be doing it.  And while being told to do something doesn’t translate into gold, there may well be good reason to follow these particular instructions.

Once you feel confident that you know the why and the what, it’s an easy jump to think about how.  I’ve always liked the mechanics of how questions:  How are we doing this?  How can we reach our goals?  How can we improve what we are doing?

When I take the time—which, alas, I don’t always—to ask these questions, I find that I am more focused, more productive and, best of all, more creative in what I am doing.

Lillian Smith was a writer who said, “When you stop learning, stop listening, stop looking and asking questions, always new questions, then it is time to die.”  At the very least, it is a sure-fire recipe to keep you from doing your best.

 

Janet Levine works with nonprofit organizations and leaders, helping them to improve capacity, build on success and overall do the best job they can.  Find out more at:  http://janetlevineconsulting.com.  While there, sign up for our monthly newsletter.

 

Posted in accountability, fundraising | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Beauty of Nudginess

My clients will tell you—I am a nudge.  Some of them might even call me a nag.  I try not to cross that line, but have determined better to nag occasionally than to let things go.  After all, they did hire me to help them accomplish something.

But you, you fundraiser you, perhaps you feel that your prospects and donors didn’t hire you to nudge, nag or bug them in any way.  And here I will say that you have found the one way to take donor-centered fundraising too far!

Your bosses have hired you to raise funds so that your organization can excel at what it does.  So, when you reach out, hoping for an appointment and it doesn’t happen right away—reach out again.  And again.  Until you get that appointment OR the person tells you cease and desist.

Of course, just being a nudge won’t get you very far—you have to do with panache.  More to the point, you have to have a purpose to your nudginess—one that clearly benefits the nudgee in some way.

That, said one of my clients as we were discussing this very issue, is the rub.  She couldn’t fathom what purpose she could propose that would benefit the person with whom she wanted to meet.  And that, frankly, astounded and concerned—concerns–me.

All interactions bring something to the involved parties.   If I am basically philanthropic—and not everyone is—and if what you do is of more than a passing interest to me, I very well may want to learn more about your organization.  Understand, this may not translate into “I want to give you a gift.”  It may never translate that way.  Or, it might.  But it is unlikely—unless I have already been courted and won over—that I will be willing to reach into my pocket at our first meeting.  Too many nonprofit leaders and fundraisers don’t seem to get this.

A former client called me in a panic.  She had bought a list and sent out a direct mail appeal.  Surprise!  No one responded with a check or a credit card number.  She had resorted to buying a list because no one she had asked to support her organization in the past nine months had agreed to do so.

Tell me, I asked her, what—exactly—you’ve saying to the people you’ve approached and what was in your mail appeal.

Both activities kind of went like this:
“Hi—give me money.”

You know, every one of those folks could have used a little nudge.  A nudge that says, “I’d like to give you an opportunity to get to know us, to see if we have a fit.  For you to discover if what we are doing is aligned in any way with your hopes, dreams, aspirations.”

And then you keep nudging—to bring them closer; to get them more involved.

Yes, often, there is no commonality.  They don’t care what you do; or they care but they are not enamored with the way you do it.  Or you are located in the wrong place; serving the wrong population; trying to involve them in the wrong thing at the wrong time.

But when you get a no—which you will get often—you need to nudge to find out which no it is.  And then you may have to continue nudging to see if you can turn that no into a yes.  Not today, but maybe tomorrow—or the day after.

How often do you nudge? As with so many things, the only possible answer is:  It depends.  On where you are in the relationship; on what expectations they’ve put out for you; on the signals you get from them.

It’s a fine dance.  Still, more people will be offended if you simply drop them—“he called me once, and then I never heard from him again”—or send one appeal out of the blue, and then never contact them again, than you could ever offend by prodding them to get to know you and your organization.

Do ask, and ask again—but be mindful of what you are asking for.  The right ask can be an impetus to a strong(er) relationship; the wrong one can derail something even before it starts.

Or as my husband recently commented, I’m nagging when I ask him to clean up the piles of papers and books that seem to creep from his office to every other room in our house;  I’m nudging him when it’s about something he wants to do, but needs some help to get over his inertia.

 

Janet Levine works with nonprofit organizations, nudging them toward building greater capacity and raising a lot more money.  Learn more at http://janetlevineconsulting.com, and while you visit, sign up for our free monthly newsletter.

Posted in cultivation, fundraising, relationships | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

The Importance of Impact

Ask a nonprofit professional what his or her nonprofit does and the answer will undoubtedly be a litany of the activities the organization performs.  It’s not surprising, therefore, that most appeals for support focus on the needs of the organization in order to implement these tasks.  It’s all so very inward looking and as such, often puts your donors precisely where you don’t want them:  On the outside looking in.

What if, instead, that nonprofit professional talked about the impact or outcomes of the work they do?  And if appeals thought about the accomplishments their donors imagined?  I suspect rather more prospects would become donors and more donors would repeat their acts of generosity.

We all know that the story of one person is easier to understand and care about than huge numbers and raw data.  Hearing about the outcome of the work the nonprofit does—what it means to that one person—brings it closer to home.  That, in turn, makes it real.  And real makes it something you want to fund.

Real, however, to the donor.  And that means understanding who your donors are and why they care about your organization.  Real also means speaking in a language they can understand and which has meaning.

If I hear about one more school that “nurtures” its students; social service agency that works with “at risk” youth or “underrepresented” populations, I may just have to scream.  I’ve been at this for many, many years, and really, enough is more than enough.

Can we just talk about what we do and why we do it?  Kids who don’t know how to add and subtract numbers, can’t read or understand all but the simplest words, certainly don’t face a bright future.  So how many students actually learn those skills?  What has it meant one, two, five…ten years out?

What has your program accomplished (achieved, completed, done) and what does that mean to your clients, the neighborhood, the larger community?  Great, you’ve fed 50,000 people.  And yes, that by itself tells a story.  But  what has been the effect on them, on society, on their children and looking forward to their children’s children.

Maybe nothing.  Perhaps your impact is purely local and immediate.  There is nothing wrong with that…and there are those who will care precisely for that reason.  So tell that story and don’t pretend, for example, that you are “breaking the cycle” of poverty if, in fact, you are not.

Measure what you are accomplishing.  Show how that makes a real difference.  Talk about the outcomes and be honest what that means.  Let’s let go of jargon and words that are meaningless.  Let’s commit to telling our stories and explaining why they truly matter. And let’s remember that a lot of little baby steps can get you a long way and impact doesn’t have to be huge to be important.

 

Janet Levine works with nonprofits, helping them to increase their fundraising capacity so they can continue to take steps large and small to impact their clients, their communities and their world.  Learn more at http://janetlevineconsulting.com

 

 

Posted in accountability, case statements, communication | Tagged | Leave a comment

Busy, Busy

Busy.  Busy busy.  Busy busy busy.  I could learn to hate that word.

I especially hate it when someone tells me that they are too busy to do something that they are supposed to be doing.  In my experience, that is generally the one person who is decidedly NOT too busy.  Indeed, you know that old saw—if you want something done…ask the busiest person you know.

Years ago, I was managing a business, going to school, AND I was a single mom.  And yet, somehow, I was the one parent who managed to go on every class trip.  It’s not because I am well organized.  Believe me. I am not.  But I was and am pretty good at triage.

Of the things I think I need to do, what are the things I really do need to do?  When do I need to do them?  What is the most effective way to do what I have to do?

Implicit in knowing what you need to do is having clarity on what you are supposed to accomplish.

I cannot begin to tell you how many development directors tell me they are too busy to get out in front of their donors.  And they don’t have the time to “babysit” their Board members, who, after all, are supposed to be fundraising.  And how busy could they—the Board members–be?  I mean, we only recruited them because they are affluent and/or influential, and those things don’t take time.

OK, I am ranting.  With cause.

I see so many organizations that are going to end this year in the red because everyone was too busy to create a serious, effective fundraising plan.  Why bother?  They would have been too busy to follow it anyway.  I have had clients who were too busy to meet, because their organization is going down the tubes, and somehow they cannot connect the dots—they hired me to help them build a sustainable fundraising program, but they are too busy to take the necessary steps.

Mercifully, these are the minority, but still, it makes me mad.

Most nonprofits exist because there is a serious need for the work they do.  And it important that they be able to meet their mission.  That, of course, takes money.  Ensuring sustainable streams of revenue is a critical piece of managing a nonprofit.  But somehow it is the one piece that too many nonprofit leaders miss.

They are good, sometimes great, at program.  They speak articulately and passionately to their cause.  They inspire, but they aren’t always savvy about the business side of the house.  Too many nonprofits don’t bring in enough funding—charitable or otherwise—to effectively make a real difference.  Instead of high impact, they show promise; instead of building, they hang on for dear life.

As we come to the end of one year and head into the next, consider how busy you are.  And think about how to ensure that you are busy doing to right and important things—the things that will not just keep your nonprofit’s doors open, but ensure that you are reaching out as far as you can.

 

Janet Levine works with nonprofits and educational organizations, helping them to increase their fundraising capacity, meet their goals and change the world for the better.  Learn more at http://janetlevineconsulting.com

Posted in accountability, capacity, fundraising, management, time management | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment